Thread: Value of: Henrik Zetterberg
View Single Post
Old
07-08-2012, 06:01 PM
  #35
AmazingNuck
Registered User
 
AmazingNuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,130
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Why? If we have Zetterberg either Kesler or Zetterberg will be on the 3rd line. Not to mention we need to get younger.

26 year old + 1st in a strong draft for Zetterberg does not accomplish that.

Not that I'm bashing Zetterberg or anything, just the Canucks don't need him.
Zetterberg has played LW before and is a fine playmaker, not to mention good defensively. Losing Edler sucks but Garrison makes up for that point shot on the power play. We lack goal scoring and Zetterberg would help us tremendously in that department.

If nothing else, we move Kesler to RW.

You're acting like having 3 strong centers is a bad thing. Crosby-Malkin-Staal worked out quite well. Zetterberg or Kesler can play the third line (oh yeah, our 3rd line wingers are quite potent themselves) and facilitate for their wingmates and give us 3 scoring lines, 2 of which can provide lockdown D.

What is the Sedins' current window? 3-4 years? So is Zetterberg's. Gotta win now. Edler won't exactly be the piece that keeps us competitive for 1 years.

AmazingNuck is offline   Reply With Quote