View Single Post
Old
07-08-2012, 11:05 PM
  #81
N o o d l e s
Registered User
 
N o o d l e s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,161
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machinehead View Post
And if we trade Kreider for Nash, who is our 1st line LW?

That's what people aren't understanding. Kreider isn't a prospect, he's already on our 1st line.

It's a pretty ****ed up situation we're in where a kid who hasn't played a regular season game is such in an important roster player, but that's the way it is. Thank our management and their vendetta against offensive depth for that.

We should be looking to fully improve the team, meaning giving up minimal roster assets to gain a roster asset. Trading one top 6 player for another is not where I want this team to go, even if the one coming back is better.
Wait, I don't get it. Nash would be your first line LW if you traded Kreider for him, no? Sure Kreider had a good playoff, but I didn't realize you guys had already penciled him into line 1. But even if that's the case and he was moved for Nash, what's the issue. Nash on first line LW is definitely better than Kreider there.

N o o d l e s is offline