View Single Post
Old
07-12-2012, 01:51 PM
  #58
squidz*
dun worry he's cool
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: South of the Border
Country: United States
Posts: 11,897
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by andbreatheme View Post
I don't quite understand what you're saying.

I'm saying they lost their depth by deciding to keep the stars (Kane, Sharp, etc.).
You're trying to say that Chicago's situation is different because they lost [x] players but Vancouver's "losing" different players. That's a pretty silly way to look at things though. It shouldn't be viewed by what they lose (which is irrelevant) it should be viewed by what they retain. Unless they perform substantially better in free agency than Chicago did, they'll be in a similar boat. At this point in time, it's a little difficult to say how they'll do in free agency. Depending upon who re-signs before next July, it could make this year's free agent pool look extremely deep.

squidz* is offline   Reply With Quote