View Single Post
07-14-2012, 03:20 AM
Exit Dose
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 19,482
vCash: 500
I don't think it's meant to be as mercenary as that. I think the broader point is that if the league wants to run as many teams as it does, then they can't expect the players to be the ones providing the bailout every time. So, the owners may have to take the hit and offer a more generous revenue sharing agreement. At least that's what I took away from it.

On a side note, does anyone else think the player in question is Parros?

Exit Dose is offline