Around The League - Hockey is back!
View Single Post
07-14-2012, 11:13 AM
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Anaheim, CA
Originally Posted by
I don't think it's meant to be as mercenary as that. I think the broader point is that if the league wants to run as many teams as it does, then they can't expect the players to be the ones providing the bailout every time. So, the owners may have to take the hit and offer a more generous revenue sharing agreement. At least that's what I took away from it.
On a side note, does anyone else think the player in question is Parros?
I think there was a thread earlier in the season where guys really analyzed it to the Nth degree based on him talking about some prior year trade deadline deal involving his team. I'm not sure they resolved it but they definitely eliminated a lot of guys. Parros didn't seem to be in the running.
View Public Profile
Eddie Shack's albums
Find More Posts by Eddie Shack