View Single Post
Old
07-14-2012, 11:52 AM
  #71
habsroom
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 287
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kriss E View Post
Diaz is better.
Weber has potential, he just needs to put it all together.
St-Denis is in the AHL, Bouillon is likely to be our 7-8th Dman.

McQuaid being better than Bouillon or St-Denis doesn't say much. It actually says nothing. The guy is just big. After that he's a bottom pairing D, and a healthy scratched one if you have a strong D squad.

Definitely not worth getting all amped up over.
Well someone has to play on the 3rd pairing so why not a big /tough/young/cheap/ stanley cup winning player? How do you consider him a healty scratch type of dman on a good team? He played in the top 6 for Boston when they won the stanley cup and he was only 23 ?

Anyways I can't change anyones mind but I know and so does all the smart hockey fans McQuaid would be a perfect dman to play with Kaberle on the 3rd pairing. I bet if I ask this question on every board here who would you rather have McQuaid or 1 of the following Bouillon/Daiz/Weber i know 25 + teams would come back with McQuaid. He is hands down the perfect bottom pair defensemen.

habsroom is offline   Reply With Quote