View Single Post
04-19-2006, 08:18 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Murfreesboro, Tn.
Country: United States
Posts: 2,747
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by vopatsrash
That's an interesting idea. I wonder if it will have any tread with the league.

Did anyone throw out any opinions on reducing games? I remember the concept of a 70-72 game season was thrown out during the lockout. I know it would entail concessions and negotiation cba-wise to adjust contracts accordingly, but I seem to remember some players being in favor of less wear and tear.
sorry vopat...reducing the numeber of games never came up in any conversation. seemed people simply accepted the fact of 82, even though crisp did complain about how the schedule was so hectic during olympic years i believe.

Pred303 is offline   Reply With Quote