View Single Post
07-15-2012, 11:34 AM
joshjull's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hamburg,NY
Country: United States
Posts: 35,941
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by jfb392 View Post
Here's my personal philosophy: ignore the media doom-and-gloom, step back, and take a realistic look at the situation.
They want you to be scared and think that it's likely to happen so you read what they're writing.
If you're not reading, their material is worthless.

Re: the initial proposal from the NHL - why would they take a chance of leaving anything on the table?
They're going to propose their ideal situation, expect not to get it, and work from there.

Also remember that both sides had prior opportunities to re-negotiate this agreement and didn't.
They pushed it to the end of the agreement that technically could have been infinitely extended, but that didn't make sense as some changes are needed.
They did not prematurely terminate the agreement though, so it's likely still temporarily workable going forward.
The owners likely know they can't afford to lockout yet again and did not opt to terminate the agreement, so one would think that they'd be fine continuing to work under it temporarily, even if it means a loss of leverage.
Fehr has said that they are working in good faith and that they are fine with the season starting while negotiations are still going on.

Yes, there are problems (some significant) but it's nothing compared to 2004-05.
These things are workable and both sides are aware of what a third lockout in the last two decades would do.
He's also the MLB union head that had the players walk out during the season which led to the concellation of the playoffs and World Series. I can't imagine the owners would be dumb enough to fall for this. It would give the players leverage they don't currently have.

joshjull is offline