Around The League - Hockey is back!
View Single Post
07-19-2012, 01:09 AM
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Perth, WA
Originally Posted by
Bobby Ryan Getzlaf
Nashville's stated that money isn't an object in retaining both Suter and Weber, after losing one money won't be an object in retaining the other. Holmgren might've just done all of Nashville's negotiating for them.
I don't doubt Holmgren thinks he has Nashville backed into a corner here. The keyword being thinks. But IMO this is the best thing that could've happened for Nashville.
If it's true that there is a year with 26m owed to Weber alone, I'm sure it gets to a point where money is an issue
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by mightyquack