View Single Post
Old
07-23-2012, 03:27 PM
  #30
this providence
Chips in Bed Theorem
 
this providence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 9,898
vCash: 500
Shocker, still voting for Zucker.

Will not understand the Dumba fascination at this stage. Especially in comparison to the type of prospects left in this pool (Zucker, Larsson, and Bulmer would all get my vote before him). I get that many see and like the "potential." Truthfully, all I see in the "potential" to be the most disappointing player in all of the prospect pool. He's that far away and that raw.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarick View Post
Carrying over from the last thread, I based my prediction on Zucker's forgettable NHL stint where he was mostly overskating the puck and kind of all over the place. I need to see how he does as a pro. Coyle being able to play different roles, like he did going from NCAA to the Q, I just think he'll be able to use that size and cycling ability more successfully.

The other kicker with Zucker is that if you compare his numbers to Parise they aren't even close (for NCAA). And they play a similar type of game, high end grinder with scoring ability.
His forgettable stint with a forgettable AHL team disguised as a NHL squad? I guess I wouldn't put much stock into Zucker's NHL games considering the jump he was making in-season and his injury.

As for the Parise comment, keep in mind that line Parise played on was one of the most prolific that NCAA has seen in a while. Bochenski never amount to much in the NHL but he was as pure of a collegiate scorer as there was at that time. When Murray came into the fold, well, there was plenty of points to be had.

__________________

After Meaningless Win - 3/29/12 - Game 77 | SoH-"Who knows, that could have cost us a Cup tonight." | Dooohkay
this providence is offline   Reply With Quote