View Single Post
Old
07-23-2012, 08:11 PM
  #116
Trident61494
Registered User
 
Trident61494's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SUFFOLK, LI, NY
Posts: 586
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltrangerfan View Post
It's a trade that had to get done.

The Rangers are clearly a better offensive team off the roster.

CBJ builds for the future. Imagine if they receive next years #1 pick in the draft? There is a methodology in their maneuvering.

Theft?

At this moment the trade is fair.


The Rangers had the pieces to move. CBJ needed to move Nash.

Sather, the magician? Yeah, right. The Rangers simply made the highest offer and the other teams said Nash is yours. CBJ received market value. No one offered more for Nash then did the Rangers.
Though it sounds like simple math it isn't.... 2+2 in this case is not 4.

To me, it's all about what was gotten. If DZ or Stepan or both were involved in a trade, how would you feel then? We got rid of two 45 pt guys and prospect and a pick...We got one of the premier scorers in the last 10 years and he would've ranked either first or second in goals the last 10 years on this team.

Dubinsky is heavily complained about or loved on this board. AA is liked indifferently and complained at his penalty and defensive prowess, and Erixon...is a wild card. Who knows what he'll be. Kreider, Stepan, and MDZ still play for us. This trade was not fair...not by a long shot.

Trident61494 is offline   Reply With Quote