Thread: Poile
View Single Post
Old
07-25-2012, 10:13 AM
  #130
dulzhok
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PredsV82 View Post
this is the pro sports equivalent of the gamblers fallacy... assuming that because we didnt trade him and got a certain result that if we had traded him we would have had the opposite result.... Hamhuis had a pretty "meh" year in his next to last season with us... to look back now and think we could have got Giroux from Philly or some other great forward has just no basis in reality.
Hamhuis got a 2nd, just for his rights. He would've had a hella a lot more value a whole year before he was UFA and the market for dmen was thin.

No he wouldn't have gotten Girioux (though Girioux was just a prospect at time), but package him with Blum, Franson, Pickard (who had value back then), etc, etc, and I guarantee there would have been a ton of interest.

It doesn't matter at this point. But Poile has done a pretty poor job of managing what used to be one of the biggest assets pools in the league. Props to him for building up that pool. But he's played a big part in diminishing it the last 2-3 years.

dulzhok is offline   Reply With Quote