View Single Post
07-25-2012, 03:15 PM
Join Date: Oct 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 196
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by airforceones25 View Post
Last 3 years..

Ryan: 100g - 192pts
Nash: 95g - 192pts

Why is Nash so much better than Ryan now? Because he's paid more? Or is it because he gets 1st unit powerplay time and Ryan doesn't? I'm confused.

So the player that is 3 years younger and nearly 3million a year cheaper without a NTC/NMC that produces the exact same amount and doesn't register any 1st unit PP time is worth less?

News to me...
if Bobby Ryan doesn't get 1st PP then hes the one to blaim.
if Nash was in ANA he'd be easily on the first wave PP.
anyways why you only be counting the last 3 years in stats..?
did Bobby Ryan hit 2x40goal years? with a 38goal year in his career?
nahh don't think he did and on top of it hes in a much better team.
Nash is more expensive because he accomplished way more.
6 teams on a NTC. none of them offered more then Dubinsky ect...
please take off your Biased goggles...
look at Nash points next year with Rangers we will see if he is only
going to hit 30 goals..

Greenstickytoes* is offline   Reply With Quote