View Single Post
Old
07-25-2012, 03:45 PM
  #128
Greenstickytoes*
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 196
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajorPain View Post
Oh please stop with the weak and selective arguments that Nash is better than Ryan.

The facts are easy to see...Nash is 3 years older, paid 3 extra millions per year, hasn't accomplished for his team, and most importantly, he's in his prime while Ryan isn't even there yet. Ryan still has upside and the fact he didn't get any 1st PP time Vs Nash getting plenty is an important factor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duckstudd269 View Post
What does Ryan have to do with anything if Nash would be on our top PP unit? Take off your stupid goggles.

First: Perry>Nash so he's not going to take his spot.

Depending on where Getz plays on top unit is the deciding factor where Nash would slot. He's not going to supplant Selanne on PP. Unless he drops off, Selanne is still one of the top players in the game on the PP. If Getz went back to the point, then Nash would probably would be on top unit. It's not far fetched by any means. Basically Nash would be in same situation that Ryan is now.
WHETHER NASH HAS MORE PP TIME. HE HAS LESS GOALS IN PP THEN RYAN DOES IN THE LAST 4 YEARS.
when Nash hit 40 goals 4 years ago he only had 6 PPG....
all of your arguments about PP time doesnt work here sorry...
try another reason please

Greenstickytoes* is offline   Reply With Quote