View Single Post
Old
07-27-2012, 11:39 PM
  #7
Czech Your Math
Registered User
 
Czech Your Math's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: bohemia
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 3,538
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taco MacArthur View Post
My answer to those who think that it can't be: you're trying to measure too much all at once (or equivalently, you're trying to take too large of a bite).

Start by measuring things that you can measure.

Or work on measuring something better - even in baseball, you can't get a perfectly isolated statistic.

Perfection is the enemy of good. If you know that you can't achieve "perfection", and that stops you from aiming for "good", then we lose in the process.
I agree with this. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater does't solve anything. Otherwise, we all go back to arguing based solely on what we (think we) saw.

As far as measuring everything at once, I see two approaches:

- using linear regression, which assigns numerical importance (coefficients) to competing factors without having to try to integrate measurements for multiple factors simultaneously

- design the study in such a way that it essentially filters out many factors which are difficult to measure and/or unknown

Czech Your Math is offline   Reply With Quote