View Single Post
07-30-2012, 02:00 PM
Registered User
Joey's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,092
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Joey
Originally Posted by habs03 View Post
I think AK and Bourque are pretty much equal, so I have no problem with ppl pefering AK. But I don't get it when people say he is "much better", what is it AK is much better at?
AK has a better physical presence and in recent times with us he became pretty good at going to the net or getting the puck from the corners. The biggest difference between the two players is that Andrei could actually hit a higher gear of dominance and take over the ice. We all know he didn't do it more than 25 games a year, but he was capable of doing it. Bourque isn't. I'd rather have 25 dazzling games of hockey from Andrei Kostitsyn than 82 floaters from Bourque.

Joey is offline