View Single Post
Old
07-30-2012, 07:49 PM
  #53
ZetterBurger
Registered User
 
ZetterBurger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 6,211
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
In terms of value, I don't think the rumour is a bad trade for the Flames at all.

However, moving Bouwmeester creates a big hole. And while I really like Filppula, I do think there needs to be a little more motivation here.

This trade may be good value for the Flames, but it may just make us a worse team.

Plus, Filppula will be a UFA after next season. That season may not even occur. We'd be trading Bouwmeester for nothing.
Well the article says that Feaster would need confirmation from Filppula that he would re-sign before he makes the trade. Losing Filppula should not be a worry of the Flames because if there was a chance of it happening Feaster wouldn't make the deal. I agree that it leaves a hole on defense for the Flames, but you are filling the 2nd line center hole and getting a reliable, big body defenseman back. I like it and hate it, but I like it more.

I completely understand why fans from both teams would be against it as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MVW View Post
How you would feel about the deal if Ericsson was swapped with Quincey? Leave the draft picks out.
I wouldn't like it. Quincey is more versatile and better in my opinion. I think he is going to be our #3 moving forward once the hole at the top is filled. I still don't want to see Ericsson go because I've always pulled for him and stuck up for him, seeing him get better and improve has been nice, but I would rather have JBo for obvious reasons.

ZetterBurger is offline   Reply With Quote