View Single Post
07-31-2012, 08:54 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,618
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by vanuck View Post
Yep - there ought to be a systematic way to account for all of these factors.
Why should there be though? Having fans rate a teams prospect pool is just as much an inexact science as having scouts rank these same players. If we asked 100 different NHL scouts to rank, or heck even just every scout in the Canucks organization I bet we'd see every single list look differently.

The word 'prospect' stands for the 'outlook of the future.'

This is the nature of the beast, but in my opinion just because Sweatt played a few games in the NHL already it doesn't mean his career has a better prospect than Labate's does.

That's the beauty of doing a random fan vote is you get everyone's singular opinion ranked into a vote, providing us with our final ranking.

Fedz is offline   Reply With Quote