Thread: Proposal: Canucks - Flyers
View Single Post
Old
08-01-2012, 10:10 AM
  #52
Sasso09
Registered User
 
Sasso09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 6,955
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuckles37 View Post
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it, but I completely disagree.
A big, physical, smooth skating, 40-50 point d-man who is pretty good defensively is a #2 d-man? Wow, you have pretty high standards.

And even if you consider Edler to be a high end #2, he's still much more valuable than a 30 year old 2nd liner.

If Philly wants Kesler + Edler, it would cost Couturier + Hartnell + Schenn + Meszaros. (and maybe even more)
Kesler = Schenn + Hartnell
Edler = Couturier + Meszaros


(and I know it means nothing since a few picks were shockingly bad, but HF recently voted Edler as the 12th best d-man, 11th if you ignore Lidstrom due to retirement)

LOL, hilarious. Nothing more to say about that.


Couturier, schenn, hartnell and Meszaros >>> Edler and Kesler.
Schenn + Hartnell >> Kesler ( serious injury questions with shoulder)
Edler >= Couturier value wise IMO, when adding Meszaros it's <

Again, hartnell was 6th in the league in goals, he's a 1st liner, you're over valuing Edler and severely under valuing Hartnell. I believe Edler has slightly more value but it's close.

Sasso09 is offline   Reply With Quote