Quote:
Originally Posted by JS19
Maybe your reading comprehension needs some help, I said ONE of the reasons. I know scoring was also a problem, but you're in denial if you think your D core was set to take on the West in the playoffs (Edler had a bad playoff series, Bieksa was very average to poor, Hamhuis was a non-factor). Why else were people so open to the idea of getting Garrison in the first place?
|
so does that mean all teams that got knocked out in the first round have sub par d?
Vancouver has an excellent d core and I think one of the better ones in the NHL at that. Subtracting Edler is a no go but even without them they are average at worst.