Thread: Prospect Info: Rangers Prospect Poll: #12
View Single Post
Old
08-03-2012, 12:11 PM
  #19
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 12,444
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRightWay View Post
While I don't disagree with you about Bourque, I still think he's a lot more likely to make an impact, even if modest, in the NHL than Ceresnak is. Bourque isn't too far off from being a decent bottom-six option. Ceresnak is a long way away from being at even Stu Bickel's level.
A 5'8'' guy with concussion problems--not someone you want playing a bottom 6 role. I'm afraid that there won't be any role for Bourque in our organization. Not entirely his fault--it's just the way things have worked out.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote