The case for a 1-year surgical tank for the Habs
View Single Post
08-07-2012, 02:18 PM
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Originally Posted by
A two year tank would be even better.
Technically this would be a two-year tank since we
tanked last year when Martin was fired.
My thread and my argumentation is rooted in a great optimism, what Alan Greenspan might call an irrational exuberance.
I believe that with just one additional stocking of great prospects like this year, and with a reasonable shuffling of veterans to clear cap space, this team will be in a position to transition to a perennial contender on the level of where the New York Rangers and the Los Angeles Kings are now.
Other people might look at the 3rd worst team in the NHL and think a 3-year rebuild might be necessary.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by DAChampion