The case for a 1-year surgical tank for the Habs
View Single Post
08-07-2012, 07:11 PM
the random dude
Join Date: Jan 2010
Originally Posted by
We should've got more for Cammy than we did. Saddling ourselves with Bourque didn't make sense. And now we have to hope that some other club out there will take a problem child from us.
Not sure why they wouldn't. The day after Cammy's comments there were tons of speculation on teams trading for him and it was universally agreed that he'd land a good return.
Instead we went for a desperation move and rushed out to trade a player who PG had figured had mortally insulted him.
My point is even if we got a 2012 1st we would of drafted Collberg with it, so how would that help us?
The purpose of getting the 1st would be to draft someone we couldn't get with a later pick.
With the way things worked out I'm happy having Collberg and a 2013 2nd rounder instead of Collberg and a later 2nd round pick in 2012 - assuming we would of drafted Thrower with our 2nd round pick - (33rd overall).
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Frozenice