View Single Post
08-10-2012, 09:40 PM
My best outfit
Vashanesh's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 2,152
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Victorious Secret;53469591[B
]I don't understand how employees can earn more than the employer. That I won't understand. If this were any other country the players would be lucky to get 50/50. They should just lock the percentage in so they don't have to keep debating this every potential lockout.[/B]

I am definitely for limited contract lengths, third party disciplinary action, and clearer language(i.e. Schultz and co. ********).

If possible, I'd like to see the shootout lengthened to 5 shooters. I just don't think 3 is enough at the moment. Sometimes you only see 4 shooters anyways and that doesn't last more than a couple minutes. The trapezoid removed and realignment would be nice, too.
Because pro sports are, without a doubt, the biggest business that's reliant on the smallest group of employees relative to their income.

Can you name a fortune 500 company that would go under if 15 of their employees were permanently lost tomorrow...? Because a strong argument could be made for a hockey team having a hell of a time staying afloat if that happened to them.

Vashanesh is offline