Thread: Value of: Mike Komisarek
View Single Post
Old
08-12-2012, 05:01 PM
  #91
seanlinden
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19,036
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GordieHoweHatTrick View Post
It wouldn't matter if he never had to handle the puck. He'll **** up every little opportunity he gets, just watch. He'll be out of this league as quickly as Mike Commodore (a year after the contract he cashed in on is over).

Ps, physical d-men don't earn their keep putting their team a man down as a result of taking dumb penalties when the game isn't even being played (post whistle), and for 4.5M you'd think your physical d-man had more than just one attribute. Just being physical doesn't make you an NHL caliber player. If that were true every dumbass with size would have an NHL job.
Not really. He's screwed up under Wilson, that's not necessarily going to hold true under Carlyle.

Phaneuf takes just as many dumb penalties, and as for only having one aspect, what do you think makes Volchenkov worth his money?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NathanHortonFan View Post
See, in order to be worth that type of money you must not only be slightly decent, but also be capable of offensive output.

Komisarek is a "stay at home" defenseman, who is barely average for his role! He is completely incapable of being worth $4.5 even at his best.
What Komisarek lacks in offensive output he has in physicality. He's also $1m less than those guys. The guy has proven capable of being a top pair defenceman in Montreal, and found a terrible situation under Ron Wilson in Toronto. No reason he can't regain form to a top 4 guy, and $4.5m is certainly within the going rate these days.

seanlinden is offline   Reply With Quote