2012-2013 Lockout Discussion Thread
View Single Post
08-15-2012, 11:12 AM
Join Date: Jul 2009
Originally Posted by
What is that non-player spending thing?
that part makes little sense to me...the logic from the player standpoint is likely that the owners want to spend 46% on player salaries and have 54% for all the other stuff. so if you reduce how much they spend on the 'other' stuff that leaves more of the pie for the players...
but in reality the owners would just use that to put more $$ into their own products...and frankly as long as the players get their share of the pie, its none of their business what the team spends the rest of their $$ on. if jim dolan wants to blow his profits on hookers and drugs, how is that a concern of rick nash as long as rick nash gets paid his $$.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Leetch3