View Single Post
Old
08-15-2012, 03:39 PM
  #78
Kingpin794
Lucky 13
 
Kingpin794's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Freeland, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 640
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieGirl View Post
You're suggesting penalizing a player for doing nothing wrong. The players, whoever they are, have not broken any OHL/CHL rules. Why on earth would you suspend an active player or penalize a current player for what an alumni has done?
You have to make a punishment that gets the point across. That's what those types of NCAA sanctions are made for. Yes you would be punishing players that had nothing to do with a violation of the rules, but it would be a future deterant for management. One year of a team being banned from the post season will hurt attendane, as well as scare away top end talent long enough to stop a team from breaking the rules twice. Putting a rule like this in place would also create the accountability I was talking about. Do you want to be the guy that ruins a chance at a playoff run for your teamates or will you think twice about taking the improper benifits?

Of course you could just be selfish (which alot of players would be) and break the rules. Nothing like burning bridges to endear you to your fanbase.

Kingpin794 is offline   Reply With Quote