View Single Post
Old
08-17-2012, 11:07 AM
  #14
seventieslord
Student Of The Game
 
seventieslord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 31,055
vCash: 500
Does QoC really not matter? I find that hard to believe. Look at two players who have recently led the NHL in +/- despite low icetime: Marek Malik and Tom Preissing. This screams of dominant play in sheltered minutes. If you were to run numbers like this for these seasons for these players, would they not show up among the leaders in +/- relative to teammates? In reality though they were playing 3rd pairing minutes and weren't considered suitable opponents for the enemy's top tier forwards. QoC has to matter; I am pretty sure it is why they led the NHL in +/-. If QoC is available and properly applied it should show that these players were not actually their team's best (though perhaps overqualified to be 3rd pairing players based on their performance those particular seasons)

seventieslord is offline   Reply With Quote