View Single Post
08-19-2012, 08:38 AM
Registered User
Sureves's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 9,393
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by barneyg View Post
My point is that the "QOC doesn't matter" conclusion can only be valid if you're looking to split players into broad skill tiers, say: great, average, replacement level. Letang, Keith, Karlsson, etc are always going to show up in the "great" category no matter their QOC -- the uncorrected bias isn't going to be enough to move them down one category. But it's likely to be enough to move a guy from #3 to #10 or vice-versa. So if your goal is to compare the top d-men with each other, you can't say "QOC doesn't matter" and ignore it.

That said, IMO the zone start adjustment is likely to be more important than the QOC adjustment.
I just don't think when we are looking at 1st pairing defenseman that the difference in QoC is going to materially affect anything - as suggested by the article. I do not believe it needs to be adjusted.

Sureves is offline   Reply With Quote