Luongo Thread - Scorcher 6: Global Meltdown (Mod Warning Post # 694)
View Single Post
08-19-2012, 08:22 PM
Join Date: Jun 2009
Originally Posted by
How are we defining depth exactly though? Sure, if Kesler/Higgins go down, our winger depth is the more effective replacement, but if Daniel/Henrik go down, our center depth is the more effective replacement.
It just seems very arbitrary where you choose to put the bar for what constitutes good depth
We have two potential 70+ point guys at center vs. 0,1 at wing,
we have 3,3 potential 40+ point guys at wing vs. two at center, and
we have 3,4 potential 20-25+ point guys at either wing vs. 5 at center.
Why do 40+ point guys count as better depth but 20+ and 70+ guys don't?
I don't know what you're talking about. If Daniel and Henrik go down, our team looks like;
Booth/Kesler/Burrows (All with a history of first line production)
Higgins/Schroeder/Hansen (wingers with a history of 2nd line production, centre with history of 2nd line AHL production)
It's still very clear that we are way better off on the wing, at least to me.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Scurr