View Single Post
Old
08-20-2012, 03:33 PM
  #351
Lars65
Registered User
 
Lars65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 120
vCash: 884
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMROWE View Post
The territory rights pay off for Hamilton might not be that low but it would be still be cheaper pay off than Markham would have to pay . Because Hamilton is far enough away that it won't impact there non hockey events like concerts ect. & thats why Markham would have to pay more for territory rights because they would impact hockey & non hockey events events .
That doesn't make a heck of a lot of sense, JM. How can the NHL claim 'territory rights' for non hockey events. It would seem to me that would be completely out of their jurisdiction.

Lars65 is offline   Reply With Quote