: Confirmed with Link:
Rick Nash+S.Delisle+cond. 3rd to NYR for Dubinsky+Anisimov+Erixon+2013 1st (Part III)
View Single Post
08-21-2012, 10:12 AM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Danbury, CT
Originally Posted by
Sooo you would rather be a contender instead of a champion?
In a way I understand what you are trying to say but there is no way to guarantee that being a yearly 'contender' would result in one or multiple cups. As much as many of us are tired of hearing about it as often as we do, 94 will forever remain one of the greatest moments for any ranger fan. You haven't heard a "1940"chant since
So a chant of 1994 in 10 years is going to be any better?
the problem is that we keep living off that one run. 1994 is going on 20 years now.
I'm not happy that we have had ONLY 2 decent shots since then.
The odds of winning it all when being a yearly contender are better than the odds of winning it all when you are a laughing stock franchise. Which the Rangers were for 7+ seasons.
Yes we have made significant strides, that is due in large part because we have not gone out for that quick fix in trading young promising players such as Weight and Amonte for past their prime players or 3rd line pluggers. that spent lass than 2 full seasons with the team (combined)
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pld459666