View Single Post
08-22-2012, 09:08 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,107
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Anton Dubinchuk View Post
I want hockey, and nothing could pass that, but I totally understand where you're coming from. Especially if the eventual agreement would mean the bigger market teams losing some revenue to guys like us.

Cons: Lose a season of hockey

Pros: Players win, revenue sharing gives us more to throw at FAs

I'd still rather have hockey. But the player's playing hardball and winning would be the next best thing, IMO.
I can't in good conscience say that the top teams should throw more money down when a team like the NHL-owned Coyotes exist. I just find it highly hypocritical to say the top should give away money to make everyone compete when teams at the bottom exist that are not seeking to maximize their own revenue.

rj is offline   Reply With Quote