View Single Post
08-23-2012, 02:54 PM
Blueline Bomber
1st Overall Pick
Blueline Bomber's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 25,062
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Shutdown Sutter View Post
No they aren't. They never were. It's two things.

1) A PR tactic.
2) It means they can go on strike at any time they want to since there's no CBA to stop them from doing so. Fehr did it in 94-95 with baseball.

Both sides are at fault here. Maybe if it didn't take the players an entire ****ing month to respond with an incomplete proposal, we wouldn't be in as bad a situation as we are now.
If they weren't happy with the current CBA, why offer the opportunity to return to the current CBA in their proposal?

The players came up with a complete proposal. They just didn't base their proposal off the proposal presented by the owners, which is where this schism has appeared. Both sides want their own proposal to be the starting point of negotiations, neither side seems particularly interested in compromising.

As far as the time table thing, both sides are a fault. They had 7 years to get it together. It's not like this displeasure at the current CBA sprung up in the last couple months.

Blueline Bomber is offline   Reply With Quote