View Single Post
08-28-2012, 06:21 PM
Registered User
Canadiens1958's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,120
vCash: 500

Originally Posted by seventieslord View Post
not sure what you're talking about.

If you're saying I would call a guy with 27 minutes a game for 27 games the #1 defenseman over a guy who played 25 for a full season, you are mistaken. I would call the 25 minute guy the #1, but I would say the 27 minute guy was a "#1 when healthy".
The basic point is that TOI or ETOI(estimated) has to reflect how the game was played/coached.

There are two situations O6/post 1967 expansion that I will use to illustrate.

O6 basically saw teams play with 4 defensemen with the 5th playing a swing role, rotating thru based on circumstances.

Rank the dmen 1,2,3,4, in terms of the team hierarchy. The coach would want his best two defensemen on the ice as much as possible. As a pairing they could not play 60 minutes but in the following pairing format:

#1 and #4, #2 and #3 it was possible to approach sixty minutes for the first two. This could produce situations where the first pairing #'s 1 and 4 would play app 31 minutes each, while the second pairing could play app 29 minutes each. This would not mean that the #4 was suddenly the #2 defenseman.

Post expansion produced interesting defensive pairings. Most of the defensmen available to the expansion teams were old, experienced whose time had to be managed. A Team with three old defencemen could break-in two young defensemen using the following rotation:

Old #'s 1,2,3, New #'s 4,5.

Basic rotation: 1/4,2/5/3/4,1/5,2/4,35, dropping down to 1/2, or 2/3 0r 1.3 at times. Point is that #'s 4 and 5 would see more TOI but that did not make them the #1 and #2.

Canadiens1958 is online now