View Single Post
08-28-2012, 11:46 PM
Global Moderator
tarheelhockey's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 52,832
vCash: 1020
Originally Posted by Hockey Team View Post
If having a family is going to make it so you can't afford to save up any money at all then I don't consider that as being affordable.
It is difficult and in many cases impossible for a middle-class person to independently raise a family on a $40k salary and still put away enough savings to cover an extended bout with unemployment. By your definition of affordability, middle class people should not have families, correct?

Same goes for mortgage/car payments.
Car payments are not optional for most people. In most places, if you want to work, you need a car.

Mortgage payments are the result of owning property and ceasing the cycle of throwing money down a hole and then finding more money to follow it. Again, people with limited personal resources are least able to afford an entire lifetime of paying landlords instead of building equity. At some point, one reaches a phase in which they money they are "saving" is no longer equal to the amount they are losing in the long term.

It's very easy to brush off these issues with a "well, it's your own fault, screw you". That attitude fails to acknowledge that most people live their lives with a desire to marry, bear children, own a home, and feel like they have accomplished something other than scraping together a few pennies for future layoffs. Most people are able to throttle back on luxuries when their pay gets cut, but losing their entire income attacks the basic building blocks of their lives and self-worth. That's one reason to favor pay cuts over layoffs.

tarheelhockey is offline   Reply With Quote