Quote:
Originally Posted by brs03
The current CBA was a non-starter, and both sides knew that. Meaningless PR fluff from Fehr (though still worth doing, obviously, as PR is about all the players have to work with). The players got raked over the coals when the cap was much lower. With the cap where it is now, ownership is the side that's hurting (albeit only at the low end).
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystlyfe
And still gives them a substantially higher cut of revenue than their peers in other major NA sports. Taking home 57% of a rapidly ballooning revenue stream is a great deal for the players. Of course they were willing to extend it.
|
Wait, you mean you guys aren't easily enamoured by the player's counter offer?
It's so transparent....they offered to extend the current CBA. LOL....DUH.....it's completely in their favor, of COURSE they're willing to extend the status quo of runaway salaries and cap limits.