Prospect Thread - Part XI
View Single Post
08-30-2012, 08:33 PM
Join Date: Jul 2005
The first five paragraphs are completely out of place. Why is that so hard to see? The article is a profile of Eddie Lack based on Canucks Army's consensus rankings, not one author's soapbox to discuss his methodology for ranking prospects.
Originally Posted by
As a very biased observer, I think we put out consistently great content. What are the faults you are finding?
Our number one prospect tomorrow won't be much of a surprise. We used a 50GP cap (Tanev not eligible).
He occasionally puts out some decent stuff but Thomas Drance's work, especially his forays into stats, can be really bad.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pitseleh