View Single Post
Old
08-31-2012, 01:44 PM
  #24
DL44
Use your Game Sense!
 
DL44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Left Coast
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,893
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by seventieslord View Post
Oh, I see.

I'm not sure how that would affect it, but it would certainly insulate exceptionally good and bad players from looking like they deserve, and it would also make a player not too much above average who happens to be 24th out of 173 and only 10% better than the guy in 140th, look a lot better than they deserve.

These numbers should probably be averaged, then each factor for each player can be expressed as a percentage of that average.
thought about that..
that's where sample size comes in a bit - over a range of 173 players, there really isn't much tiering of players... its a pretty gradual progression.

And if there was to be tiering in any particular category where a player jumps up as an outlier vs the comp, its effects are squashed out with the multiple categories.



So i was going to start with a new spreadsheet based on the 2011 - 2012 season...

What do we suppose the categories should be and the make up of the formula we implement?

DL44 is offline   Reply With Quote