View Single Post
Old
09-05-2012, 12:26 PM
  #59
Boom Boom Anton
Registered User
 
Boom Boom Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,192
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueline Bomber View Post
Yeah, it wasn't so bad to have both of them on the team when LaRose was getting more Top 6 time than he will this year (hopefully), but now that they're both almost assuredly getting bottom 6 time, we really should just have one or the other.
Well, we were going to have both of them this season regardless of this contract. And maybe they do part ways (unlikely) with LaRose after this season?

Quote:
But who knows, maybe Muller will set it up so one plays on the 3rd and the other on the 4th.
I could see that.

A third line of Tlusty - 3C - LaRose.....or Bowman-Jokinen-LaRose if the team can't come up with a viable 3C and then a 4th line of Dwyer-Brent-Nodl.

Boom Boom Anton is offline   Reply With Quote