View Single Post
09-08-2012, 07:31 PM
Registered User
Dreakmur's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orillia, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,519
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Canadiens1958 View Post
Vezina for Moran in 1905 or 1906, based on an AST of uncertain provenance where the season of reference is up in the air. Then we have the attempt to use a players selection for exhibition games as an indicator of superior talent. Then the attempt at a link between HHOF worthiness and whether the candidate is alive or deceased.
He said that Moran being voted the best goalie was the equiveant to a vezina. How is that a projection?

Of course, those "exhbition games" are specfically designed to showcase the best talent in the league. As a result, the lague makes an attampt to actually selectthe best talent.

Then a link that about the HHOF was only posted to prove you were wrong about a few HHOF inductees. It had nothing todo with selling any player.

None of the above has anything to do with projecting or making assumptions of future success.

Then we have the car crash analogy. The claim that info was not provide re bios or Moran when in fact is was just a left click away. The claim about raw stats being worthless when in fact they are necessary to generate any and all adjusted numbers.
What's wrong with the car crash analogy? For the purposes of this MLD, Jonathan Quick's career is over right now. He may as well be dead.

You posted 3 rosters that I have seen, and none of them have links to anything. (,,

Raw stats are useless until they are adjusted....

Four pages into the thread and both of you are dancing around my team. No analysis have been provided.
Why don't you start us off with some analysis?

Just proclamations from the mountain and proof of ageism from both of you.
You can call it ageism if you want, but young players have incomplete careers.

Jonathan Quick only has 4 complete seasons, so how can that really comare to somebody who has 10, 15, or even 20?

Dreakmur is online now   Reply With Quote