View Single Post
09-08-2012, 10:35 PM
Join Date: Jun 2011
Originally Posted by
The 1996-group of forwards looks pretty good though, don't you think?
Sure, there's some very interesting forwards in that age group, and it's arguably a better group than the 97's.
Just to clarify, I'm not saying any age groups of forwards are bad. It's just that we won't have any problem putting together one of the best group of D's and G's for Olympic tournaments for decades to come, but when it comes to forwards we're just not as competitive. That's all. For some reason we're just better at developing defensemen and goalies.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by DSL