View Single Post
Old
09-10-2012, 09:14 AM
  #282
blahblah
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 16,389
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete goegan View Post
Here's a pretty good look at where things stand at the moment:

http://espn.go.com/nhl/story/_/id/83...te-discussions
Thanks, not a bad article.

This comes down to.

The NHLPA doesn't want the higher revenue teams keeping profits (same old, same old with every union every created). The higher revenue teams don't want to share more of that revenue with smaller markets. The higher revenue team generally don't want to keep the profits, they don't mind spending it but are impeded with the salary cap.

Little consideration is given to an even playing field for all markets. (Large markets and players union). The owners are fighting with other owners. The union is just as, if even more greedy, than the supposed evil owners.

From my perspective. 57% of revenue is idiotic even with revenue sharing.

blahblah is offline