Thread: Other: Question for the group
View Single Post
Old
09-10-2012, 03:08 PM
  #5
danaluvsthekings
Registered User
 
danaluvsthekings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,137
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by canadiensnation View Post
I don't think any team see's an NHL lockout as a beneficiary to get out of bad contracts, because they will just lose a year of millions of dollars that could of been made during the season and maybe playoffs.

Getting out of a $5M+ contract is not as bad as losing $100M+.
Of course. I just meant that if there's not going to be a season due to a year long lockout, you might get the pros of losing some contracts, but there are also some big cons to losing years on contracts as well.

danaluvsthekings is offline   Reply With Quote