View Single Post
Old
05-04-2006, 07:33 AM
  #13
mcphee
Registered User
 
mcphee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,105
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Griffin
Why would the Canucks even consider this?

They save next to nothing in the deal and massively downgrade the team. If this is the best deal the Canucks could get I'd hope that they would just hang onto Bertuzzi.
Because they sympathize with our desire to win a Stanley Cup and would hurt their franchise to help ours. Do I have to explain everything ? Sheesh.

MIller Time, your 1st scenario is interesting. Modin,Fedotenko, are solid players, and anything's possible. TB may aim higher in nets though. I think any GM would be smart to chat with Feaster on a regualar basis, because his decisions are likely to have a domino effect on a few players. Lang makes sense to me. Another year with Pleks not having to do more than he may be capable of, a year for Chipchura to develop. Bonk's last contract year. Presuming Arnott will find someone to overpay, Lang could make sense if Detroit wants to re-toll a bit.

The problem with dealing though is that you know where the conversations start.

Higgins,Pleks,Chipchura etc.

mcphee is offline