View Single Post
09-11-2012, 08:05 PM
IceManCat's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Miami
Country: United States
Posts: 3,326
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Sidney the Kidney View Post
What part of this is hard for you to comprehend?

I responded to that guy, and part of his post mentioned 70-80 points. So I was responding to him saying that yes, I believe 70-80 points isn't realistic, and then went on to explain to him what I believed was a more realistic projection for Gudbranson's upside based on the strengths in Gudbranson's game.

That was the full extent of my post touching on anything you may or may not have said in your post. Yet you seem to think that my post was directed at you in some sort of "lol that dude's nuts if he thinks Gudbranson can reach those totals".

It wasn't related to your post other than to touch on that part of his post to agree that that kind of high point production is highly unlikely for Gudbranson, then I moved on to the main point of my post, which was discussing my thoughts on Gudbranson as a whole.

Or to sum up in plain English, my post was directed at what was said in the post I quoted, not at your post. Do you understand now?

And I am trying to tell you that REGARDLESS of what you went on to talk about you still mentioned the point totals I know the post was not directed at me because I am have nothing to do with your opinion. BUT you still mentioned the point totals THEREFORE are included in the people I was referring too which was the original point.Trying to manipulate your way out of the original point is a Red Herring my friend. I will get back on topic and say I agree with what you had to say

IceManCat is offline   Reply With Quote