View Single Post
Old
09-12-2012, 03:17 PM
  #18
bozak911
Ignoring Idiots
 
bozak911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,911
vCash: 500
It sounds like the owners went back to the current definition of HRR with the proposal sent out today. I'd be curious to know what they dropped from the original proposed changes.

It includes a 9.7% rollback of player salaries immediately. Although, it sounds more like they would put that into escrow, rather than a direct scaleback, which equals essentially, the same thing.

So let's hypothetically say that the new proposal is the 2005 CBA with the following;
2012-2013: Player Portion of HRR = 47.3%
2013-2014: Player Portion of HRR = 48.5%
2014-2015: Player Portion of HRR = 50.0%

And then stays there for the duration of this CBA...

Do you think the players would balk at that?

The basic premise is that nothing else changes from the current CBA to a simple roll back of the Player Portion of HRR with a graduated increase to a true 50%.

No changes to contract length, term, etcetera...

bozak911 is offline   Reply With Quote