View Single Post
Old
09-12-2012, 04:59 PM
  #394
Sydor25
LA Kings
 
Sydor25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North Texas
Country: United States
Posts: 21,849
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Sydor25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy Stardust View Post
I think the reduction has to be at a slower and steadier rate. Going from 57% to 49% to 47% isn't progress. If they want a true partnership, why not work down to 53% and incrementally lower their stake to an even 50-50 partnership?
But the players won't even negotiate with the NHL. They are sticking with their stupid 3+1 year deal. The NHL will never accept the NHLPA's structure. The players will make $0 next year and will never be able to make up for that loss, the NHL revenues will fall if there is a lockout and if they somehow get 57% of the revenues in the next CBA after a lost season, the players 57% will probably be lower than if they just accept a CBA tomorrow near what the NHL is offereing.

Losing 7-9% next season is much better for the players than trying to "win".


Last edited by Sydor25: 09-12-2012 at 05:05 PM.
Sydor25 is offline   Reply With Quote