View Single Post
09-12-2012, 08:30 PM
Elever's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,476
vCash: 500
They shouldn't have to budge though if the premise of them budging (teams losing $ when they're really not) is flawed.

If I were a PA member, I wouldn't budge off 57% either UNTIL the NHL was willing to increase revenue sharing via richer clubs giving to the bottom 10-12.

People today turned against the PA I noticed. I hope this time though with Fehr in charge, they won't bend over like the last time and not care about public opinion. In fact their initial offer was flawed. They should've done what the NHL did, make an unreasonable initial offer and then come down to 57% with the revenue sharing added proposal. Then we'd be saying the opposite.

Elever is offline   Reply With Quote