View Single Post
09-13-2012, 03:18 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Germany
Posts: 4,931
vCash: 500
What I don't understand is why the players initially wanted a three year CBA and still want a shorter term than the NHL? Don't they notice that they usually lose in the negotiations? They clearly lost last time, and by all accounts it looks like they'll lose a few percentage points this time around. I doubt they'll get that back next time around, so a longer CBA seems to be the better choice after all.

jniklast is online now